25 days of disappointment

Let me tell you about how, a few years ago, I created a family Christmas tradition …

… which has caused me nothing but stress, and given my kids 25 days of disappointment.

It began one day in Aldi, as disappointment often does.

I had the choice between buying an advent calendar for $12, or 25 small ‘stockings on a string’ for $5.

Guess which one the Barefoot Investor chose?

Now, given stockings on a string aren’t as intuitive as opening a calendar each day, I concocted a complicated backstory that involved elves coming to the farm each night and leaving a gift in a little numbered stocking to help the kids count down to Christmas.

Father of the year, right?

Wrong.

There’s always at least one night I forget, meaning I have to explain to our lip-quivering kids the next morning why the elves didn’t come. Slightly better, one morning I bolted upright in bed as I heard the kids stirring, raced down the hall, and stuffed something in the stocking:

“Dad, the elves gave us … a AAA battery?”

“They’re smart, those elves. You never know when you’ll need a battery … like for the TV remote”, said the worst father in the world.

Ho! Ho! D’Oh!

Christmas may be known as the time for ‘giving’, but to most school-aged kids it’s really a time for ‘getting’:

A survey by News Limited earlier this month found that an overwhelming majority of parents (76%) say their kids have higher expectations of what Christmas presents they’ll receive compared to when they were kids.

Yet expectation is one reindeer down from entitlement.

So while ‘25 days of disappointment’ is a family Christmas tradition I’ve created, it’s not the only one.

Throughout the year my kids follow the Barefoot ‘3, 3, 3’ rule of pocket money. (Three weekly jobs, dished into three jam jars marked ‘Splurge’, ‘Smile’ and ‘Give’, checked off each Sunday night in three minutes.)

And the most important money jar at this time of the year — when we’re being undermined by fat men in red suits, and bombarded with advertising — is the Give Jar.

This simple little pocket money system has helped us create a new family legend: our family helps people in our community who are doing it tough at Christmas. That’s what we do … that’s who we are. We’re givers and it feels great.

Now that is a Christmas family tradition that will breed happiness and kindness.

Tread Your Own Path!

The Most Moving Message I Received in 2018

Throughout the year, I’ve received thousands of messages from Barefooters.

This is the one that moved me the most:

Dear Scott,

Five years ago our middle child was diagnosed with brain cancer, at five years old. We had to move to the city for his treatment, and my husband had to commute for work as much as our situation allowed. This meant we had to find funds for rent as well as mortgage and bills, all while living off a very limited wage. We didn’t even qualify for a credit card, though after reading your book I’m so glad we didn’t get one.

After our son passed away, we spent years trying to claw our way back from financial ruin, and it was near on impossible — until I was told about your book eight months ago. I thought I would struggle to read it (that the financial terms would go over my head), but you had me laughing, crying and captivated to the end.We honestly thought we were in for a lifetime of debt, but thanks to you we are already breathing easier. We are in a far better position than we were, and the improvements we’re making are noticeable. And with your new ‘Families’ book our children are learning to be smart with their money too. We’ve started the jam jars with our little ones, and our teens have both got jobs and set up their bank accounts to include savings. I am so proud of them and completely loving that I have been able to give them the headstart I never had.

I can honestly say that if not for your advice we would never have reached a position of financial freedom. So from the bottom of my broken heart, thank you.

Jennie

Thank you for writing, Jennie.

I’ve chosen your letter to end my column on for 2018 because you epitomise what Barefooters around the country are doggedly working towards: looking after their family, and gaining financial control.

That you’ve soldiered on through your heartbreak is a testament to your strength.

You Got This.

And to you ‒ the person reading this ‒ thank you for helping me spread my message to people like Jennie.

This wraps up my columns for the year. I’m taking the school holidays off to hang out with the family, and will be back ready and raring to go in 2019.

Tread Your Own Path!

Scott

A super fund option with ZERO fees?

If you’ve been reading my stuff for a while, you’ll know I bang on – a lot – about minimising your super fees.

Well, today I’m going to tell you about a super fund that has zero fees. As in a donut.

From the get-go of my career, I’ve advocated that people should invest in low-cost index funds for their super. (An index fund simply tracks the market by automatically investing in, say, the top 300 companies on the market).

And I have put it on record that I invest my super with Australia’s lowest cost index super fund, the Hostplus Index Balanced Fund.

This has opened me up to criticism that I’m biased towards Hostplus, yet my answer has always been the same:

I have no axe to grind, it’s simply about getting the lowest fees.

The long-term evidence is clear:

If you’re investing in anything other than a low-cost index fund, you’re likely to be a loser.

Ratings agency Standard and Poor’s (S&P) has tracked over one thousand managed funds and ranked them against a simple, low-fee index fund over a 15-year period.

Almost nine in ten (87 per cent) international share funds failed to beat a simple low-cost index fund.

Almost eight in ten (77 per cent) Aussie share funds underperformed a simple low-cost index fund.

Faced with this overwhelming evidence, investors the world over have embraced index funds.

It’s not even debated any more … except here in Australia.

We’re like the flat-earthers of the finance world, openly questioning the ‘lower fees equal higher returns’ argument.

And the result is … last year Aussie super funds swiped $32 billion in fees, which over the long term robs future retirees of hundreds of thousands of dollars from their nest eggs.

ASIC has been trying to force fee-gouging super funds to give investors more transparency on the fees we pay, yet this week it was delayed again … thus far it’s dragged on for almost six years!

(No surprise there: Warren Buffett has sagely warned, “Remember, your fees are their income”.)

Anyway, of the thousands of super funds on offer, only a surprising few offer low-cost index funds, like Hostplus does. And I’ve always said that the day another low-cost index fund came onto the market, I’d let you know about it too.

Well, today is that day.

This week REST Super launched a suite of index funds that have 0 per cent fees:

• Australian Shares Index Fund – which tracks the 300 biggest companies in Australia (think the banks, Woolies, CSL, Sydney Airport).

• Overseas Shares Index Fund – which tracks 1,576 of the biggest companies in the world (think Amazon, Alphabet (Google), Berkshire Hathaway, and Toyota … though no tobacco stocks, which this fund has chosen to strip out). Dividends are reinvested in Aussie dollars.

• Balanced Index Fund, which consists of 30 per cent Australian shares, 45 per cent overseas shares, 20 per cent bonds and 5 per cent cash.

(Technical point: REST is using Macquarie Bank’s True Index funds, which use derivatives to manage their portfolio. REST say they have done their due diligence and are comfortable with the risk.)

Let’s be fair dinkum though … nothing is free (except my wife’s apricot chicken casserole … and that has its own risk profile).

So how can this fund be free?

The answer is, it’s not. The investment fee is zero, that’s true.

However, REST also charges an administration fee, which is $67.60 per year plus 0.10 per cent of your super balance per year (capped at $800 per annum).

Still, it’s very cheap.

Of course, before you switch to this (or any other) fund, I’d suggest you speak to a professional and get personal advice. Just make sure you’re speaking to an advisor who puts your interests first, and advocates low-cost investing.

Tread Your Own Path!

Reminder: I first wrote about this years ago and highlighted the low fees. Today there are cheaper index super funds on offer. How do I know? Because my readers constantly email me about them! So before you do anything, go to YourSuper.gov.au and compare super funds first.

Spreading the Love

Dear Scott,

I am the Team Manager for Domestic and Family Violence Programs for Mercy Community. I am not asking for anything ‒ I just wanted to let you know that I am applying for a grant as part of Queensland Women’s Week to put together financial packs for women in refuges to help them with their financial literacy post-separation. The grant is for $3,000 and I am aiming to buy 100 of your Barefoot Investor for Families book for the packs, along with supporting information. If you object to this, please get in touch.

Carmel

Hi Carmel,

I object! You shouldn’t have to pay a cent for those books!

Supporting some of the most vulnerable people in society — abused women and their kids — is critically important work. So I’ll send you 100 copies of my old book, The Barefoot Investor, and 100 copies of my new book, The Barefoot Investor for Families. Thanks for what you do.

Scott

Could We Lose All Our Money?

My husband and I are working through your book, but we are stuck at the superannuation chapter. We both work for the Queensland Government and have our super in the QSuper Lifetime Aspire fund. The fee is 0.9%, which is just above your recommended 0.85%. QSuper feels ‘safe’. If we changed to another fund, can we be sure we are guaranteed by the Government? Could we lose all our money?Thanks,

Merryn

Hi Merryn,

Let me clear this up: you are not guaranteed by the Government if you lose all your money in super. (That only happens with money you have in the bank -- see the question above.)

Instead, your superannuation fund is a trust, and the trustees of the fund are legally obliged to act in your best interests (as the Royal Commission has shown, some do a better job of this than others). QSuper appears to be doing a good job: they’re a not-for-profit industry fund that charges competitive fees, and they have a decent track record.My advice would be to call up the fund and request to sit down with one of their advisors, and have them help you select the most appropriate asset mix within your current QSuper fund. Why? Well, a Vanguard study showed that 90% of your returns comes from the asset allocation you choose. Make that your focus.

Scott

Reminder: I first wrote about this years ago and highlighted the low costs. Today there are better deals on offer. How do I know? Because my readers constantly email me about them! So before you do anything, do a quick google.

Bailing Out My Boyfriend

Hi, I’m a huge fan!

My boyfriend is currently working overseas, and we plan to ‘go Barefoot’ when he gets back so we can tackle our debts. My accountant suggested we first pay off the personal loan my boyfriend got, which he consolidated his credit card debt into -- a loan that was only possible with my name on it. The accountant suggested using my inheritance, which I currently have in our joint offset account. Trouble is, my boyfriend now has another credit card and I worry I would be bailing him out again! What should I do?

Mel

Hi Mel

Your accountant is just looking at the digits:

The interest on the personal loan is costing you more than the offset, so you could save money by extinguishing that debt. And given you’ve already contracted an STD (Sexually Transmitted Debt) -- that is, you’re now both jointly and severally liable for repaying the loan -- it makes total sense financially.

However, if I were in your situation, I wouldn’t repay the loan.

(Actually, I wouldn’t have co-signed the personal loan in the first place, but I’m a little Judge Judy like that.)

First, because you don’t want to set up the expectation that you’ll reward his dumb behaviour.

And second, because you’re already giving him a helping hand. By keeping your inheritance parked in your joint offset account, you’re already effectively lowering your mortgage repayments, giving him a fantastic opportunity to ditch the credit card and domino his debts.

I’d sell it this way: this is an excellent way to show his commitment to both the Barefoot plan, and you!

Scott

The Best Thing I Ever Saved For

Dear Mr Pape,

I bought your book while in severe financial difficulty — I actually had to save money for six weeks just to buy it! Anyway, I am 10 months in and will never look back, having managed to pay off $25,574.23 worth of debt. I still have a fair way to go, but I am churning through it. Thanks heaps!

Callum

Hi Callum,

Dude, you could have loaned it from the library!

What I love about your email (okay, testimonial), is how detailed you are with your digits:

You haven’t just paid back ‘twenty five grand’, you’ve calculated it down to the cent!

A report this week by NAB found that 20% of Aussies said they don’t have even a cracker saved up.

Don’t let that be you.

If you’re following my plan, you should have nailed the first step: open your separate Mojo account, with an initial $2000 deposit. And if you don’t have a spare $2000, look around your house and see what you can flog on Gumtree.

Scott

The Giving Game

Hi Scott,

My daughter would like to donate the contents of her money box to a charity. I really want to take her to one in person, rather than doing it online, so she can be a part of the process. But I am finding it increasingly challenging to find information on where we can do this ‒ none of them seem to want to interact in person. Any ideas?

Jill

Hi Jill,

I think there are more meaningful ways to teach giving than handing over cash.

Instead, my experience is that food is the perfect way to teach your kids about giving.

Reason being, every kid knows what it’s like to be hungry: you can’t concentrate, and you’re irritable until you eat.

So, you can explain that on a typical day roughly three kids in her class will arrive at school hungry or without having eaten breakfast, according to Foodbank. (This explains why approximately 1,750 schools across the country have Breakfast Clubs, to ensure kids are getting their most important meal of the day. They’re in poor areas. They’re in wealthy areas. They’re in my home town.)You can also explain that just because you can’t see their tummies rumbling doesn’t mean they’re not hungry.Not only is food a powerful metaphor for kids, even better, your kid has the chance to do something about it.

Last year charities across Australia had to turn away 65,000 hungry people each month because there wasn’t enough food to go around.

However, there’s no need to start feeding the masses bread and fish like a motivated messiah.

Instead, when you’re next walking around the supermarket, ask your kids, “What can we buy for hungry people?”

You can donate things like canned foods, spreads, coffee, flour, sugar and baby food. Have your kids bring along some money from their Give Jar so they can buy food with their own money, and then on the way home you can drop it off at the local Foodbank warehouse, or your local community charity that distributes food in your area (you can find their contact details from your local council).

Scott

The Dollarmite Rebel

Hi Scott,

I purchased your latest book, The Barefoot Investor for Families, and gave it to my nine-year-old son, who has taken to it like a duck to water. He is enthusiastically helping with cooking, and has set up his three jam jars. He has a presentation at school coming up and, due to inspiration from your book, he wants to do his talk on why his school should give Commbank the flick. I don’t want to discourage him, as I too believe in the cause -- but is it something best left for parents to bring up with the school?

Barry

Hi Barry

What do I reckon?I reckon this sounds like a life lesson he’ll remember for years to come.Here are a few things I’d talk through with your son:

Explain that a credit card is a very expensive loan from a bank. Young people often get themselves in a lot of trouble with credit cards by borrowing too much. Credit cards tend to make everything you buy much more expensive. For most people -- especially young people -- the best credit card is no credit card.And perhaps he could ask:

Why does Commbank’s Start Smart Program teach kids -- in grade three -- about the benefits of credit cards?

Then he could ask his teachers:

Have you ever got in trouble with a credit card?When we get older, should we get one?

A big part of financial education is to be skeptical about what banks (and advertisers in general) offer up.

You’re teaching your son to be an independent thinker and to intelligently and respectfully question authority.

In this case, he’s got truth on his side: there is no justification for allowing a bank to spend millions of dollars for the exclusive right to teach our kids this core life skill, much less for rolling out a marketing program that is worth, according to one analyst, as much as $10 billion!

Let me know how he goes!

Scott

The 3 books I’m giving for Christmas this year

Christmas shopping sucks, right?

Not for me.

Years ago, I cracked the Christmas shopping code: I buy people books.

Although I must confess, last year it didn’t work out so well.

I bought my mother-in-law Marie Kondo’s The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up.

She opened the present, scanned the title, and the look on her face said it all.

“Oh, I’m not saying you’re a hoarder … it’s just … a really good book. Merry … Christmas”, I added.

Silence.

Anyway, you’re not going to be that stupid, so here are the books I’ve got in my Santa sack this year:

Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World — and Why Things Are Better Than You Think

Bill Gates says this is one of the most important books he’s ever read.

Author Hans Rosling systematically unpacks fake news, sensationalist clickbait, and doom-and-gloom headlines with cold hard facts: actually, in almost every way, the world is getting much better.

While the media reports obsessively on the latest drama of the moment, the upward movement of human progress marches on with little fanfare. This book shows you how to look at the world in a rational, fact-based way.

A perfect gift for your manic-depressive, we’re-going-to-hell-in-a handbasket, MAGA-hat-wearing brother-in-law.

Where Are The Customers’ Yachts?

This year we’ve watched — gobs agape — at the sheer rat cunning of financial institutions: charging dead people for advice, ripping off the mentally disabled, and billing for advice they never gave.

Has it always been this bad?

Hell, yes!

Almost 80 years ago Fred Schwed wrote the book Where Are The Customers’ Yachts?

The title of the book comes from a legendary story about a visitor to New York who stands admiring the expensive yachts of the Wall Street brokers. He naively asks, “Where are all the customers yachts?”

Of course, there were none. As every bank CEO knows intuitively, the really big money is made in providing financial advice, rather than receiving it. This book will make you laugh and cry.

A great book for anyone who is reviewing their super fund fees over the holidays.

How to Break Up with Your Phone

Our phones (and the apps on them) are designed to be highly addictive. They manipulate our brains, suck up ever increasing amounts of our attention, and capture the one true resource we can never replace: our precious time.

Author Catherine Price explains how phones are changing our brains, and provides a four-week program that shows you how to break up with your phone and form a healthier relationship with your screen.
A great gift for … me.

And yes, you guessed it, I’ll also be gifting my book, The Barefoot Investor for Families.

I’ll confess: while I originally wrote the book for parents and grandparents, a huge surprise for me has been how successful the book has been with kids. I’m pitching it as a perfect stocking-filler. After all, the skills the book teaches will set their kids up for life. And that’s a pretty cool Christmas present to give, right?

Tread Your Own Path!

Why Afterpay is the marijuana of credit

I think of Afterpay as the financial equivalent of marijuana.

Young people absolutely love it, and old people are doing a lot of finger-waving about the dangers of getting hooked on the newest financial drug to hit the streets.

This week the financial equivalent of a teacher, ASIC, busted into the school locker rooms (quick, hide the bongs!) and attempted to clear the air by holding its first review into the phenomenon that is ‘buy now pay later’, otherwise known as ‘young people’s layby’, otherwise known (by me) as ‘financial weed’.

Here’s some of what ASIC found:

The majority of Afterpay customers are millennials.

One in six of them are in financial strife … getting overdrawn, delaying bills, or borrowing more.

And these services are hot: the number of transactions has risen from 50,000 a month in April 2016 to 1.9 million in June 2018, with the collective tab now at a whopping $900 million plus.

Now, understand there’s nothing really revolutionary about Afterpay — men in grey suits have been dreaming up new ways to get people to spend money they don’t have since long before Bob Marley rolled his first spliff.

This is just the latest incarnation. (Case in point: when I was at uni the bank gave me a student banking package that bundled in a credit card with a $3,000 limit ‘just in case’, and effectively trained me to see their credit limit as my money. See? Same, same but different. Even the excuses are similar: “Oh, but if I pay off my credit card in the 55-day period, it’s free!”)

My opinion?

The actual terms on Afterpay are not that bad. As long as you pay off your instalments on time, you won’t be charged any interest or fees. So, as far as consumer credit drugs go, it’s not too heavy. Your financial life won’t be ruined by taking out a few Afterpay loans.

So chillax, right?

Well, no. See, the reason I compare Afterpay to weed is that it acts like a a gateway financial drug: it’s effectively training young people to rely on the bank’s money rather than banking on themselves.

Case in point: Afterpay claims their average purchase is $150.

A hundred and fifty clams!

Seriously, if you need instalments to cover $150, you need to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

And, once you get hooked on spending someone else’s money, there’s every chance you might graduate onto harder stuff — other millenial credit-drug dealers who really rip you off.

Who knows? Maybe in the future we’ll have before and after photos like they do with meth heads:

Before: This is a fresh faced Emma, aged 18, buying a pair of pink pumps on Afterpay.

After: This is a stressed out Emma, aged 23, buying scratchies with her Nimble loan.

Seriously, you’re never going to win if you don’t learn to stand on your own two feet and pay your own way.

And that’s why the ‘buy now, pay later’ phenomenon … is true to label.

Get hooked on this junk and you’ll pay a very high price later.

Tread Your Own Path!

Southern Cross Travel Insurance

Hi Scott,

This question is for my brother. After being diagnosed with serious bone cancer in March 2017, he proceeded to apply to his travel insurer -- Southern Cross Travel -- for a refund on his overseas trip, planned for April 2017. But Southern Cross have refused to pay up the $4,000. His doctors are at a loss as to why they won’t pay -- fairly cut and dried they thought. How damn sick do you need to be? Please help!

Nick

Hi Nick,

I read through Southern Cross’ Product Disclosure Statement.

It’s pretty clear: “This policy automatically includes cover … for actual and reasonable losses incurred by you because of an unexpected event, if you have to cancel or change the dates of your journey before leaving Australia.” And it details one of the ‘unexpected events’ as the “diagnosis of a terminal condition, or a condition requiring radiotherapy or chemotherapy”. They say they’ll pay up to $2,500 on a single trip.

Like your brother’s doctors say, it seems pretty cut and dried, so perhaps I’m missing something.

Or maybe it’s Southern Cross that’s missing something. Most big companies have sophisticated media tracking systems which alert them to when their names are mentioned in the media.

So, since this column is being published across the country, maybe they’ll pick it up.

Just in case, let’s throw in a few keywords: “Southern Cross Travel Insurance Fair Suck of The Sav”.

Let’s see if Southern Cross Travel Insurance reviews your brother’s case and, if he’s in the right, pays the claim.

Over to you, Southern Cross Travel Insurance.

Scott

Does Renting Now Make Sense?

Hi Scott,

I would like your thoughts on something that is bothering me. Forecasters think that house prices are set to fall at least 5% over the next year. If you buy a million-dollar house now, in a year you will have paid 4% stamp duty upfront and 4% interest in servicing -- and suffered a 5% drop in value. That’s 13% gone, wiping out over half of a 20% deposit! Isn’t renting at a 3% to 4% yield better? Should there be a ‘Barefoot Warning’ that rent money sometimes is not wasted?

Dee

Hi Dee,

My warnings for first home buyers aren’t about falling property prices, but rising interest rates.I devoted an entire chapter to it in my book: it’s called ‘The Curious Case of the Postcode Povvos’ … first home buyers who live in cafe suburbs … but can’t afford a coffee because they’re a slave to their mortgage.

In that regard, I totally agree that rent money is not dead money if you can’t afford to comfortably service a mortgage and have a commonsense buffer for higher interest rates (which will come at some stage in the next decade).

My view?

With falling prices, there is absolutely no rush to buy your first home. Yet don’t get paralysis by analysis. You’ll pay stamp duty and interest whenever you decide to buy. So, once you find a home you love, that you can afford, and that you will live in for at least a decade, buy it.

Scott

Boost My Super Just By Shopping? SuperSuper!

Hi Scott,

I am hearing a lot of advertising for SuperSuper ‒ a shopping rewards program that pays rewards directly to your super account with GuildSuper. It’s targeting women, enabling us to boost our super balances by doing nothing different ‒ we are shopping anyway! What are you thoughts on this?

Louise

Hi Louise

I actually heard SuperSuper advertised on the radio, and my first thought was:

“Well, this sounds like the financial equivalent of a Spice Girls song.”

Girl Power! Yeah! We can shop and save for our super!

So I’ll tell you what I want, what I really, really want.I want a super fund that doesn’t zig-a-zig-ah: GuildSuper has underperformed an average super fund over 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years, according to Superratings. I assume this is because their fees are a little, shall we say, Scary Spice. At 1.38% per annum plus $95 a year.

Bottom line? Any money you save from their slick shopping campaign, you’ll give back in higher fees and lower returns (and then some).

So, if you want to be my (super) lover, you’ve got to get with my plan.By all means score rewards from shopping, but you don’t need GuildSuper to do it (though hats off to GuildSuper for making it super … simple).

All you need to do is Google “Woolworths discount cards” and you can get 5% off your shopping. (Tightarse tip: most retailers offer these discounts if you buy their gift cards or e-vouchers … because they bank on a certain percentage of people losing the cards or forgetting about them, and they’ll pocket the money.)

Then, take your savings and make a contribution into an ultra-low-cost index super fund.

Spice up your life!

Scott

Buffett’s Secret Aussie Share Play?

Hi Scott,

I know you’re a fan of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway. Well, there’s a relatively small listed investment company (LIC), called Global Masters Fund Limited (ASX: GFL), that invests in Berkshire Hathaway, UK shares and cash. It appears to have performed fairly well over the last five years or so. I am considering investing in it but have some reservations, like their exposure to the UK market given the Brexit situation. Is there any advice you can provide on weighing up a fund like this?

Terry

Hi Terry,

Yes, I’ve heard of Global Masters.

I wrote about them when they first listed in 2006, and then sent my column to Warren Buffett himself in the post (he doesn’t do email). A few weeks later, Buffett sent me a handwritten letter thanking me for alerting him to Global Masters, and for advising people not to invest in them.

As of 30 September the Global Masters portfolio has 63.8% invested in one stock, Berkshire Hathaway, 9% in ASX-listed investment company Flagship Investments, 6% in the Athelney Trust PLC, 6.3% in cash, and 14.7% in something they refer to as “other UK”.

(Interestingly, the Managing Director of Global Masters is also a director of Flagship Investments, and the Athelney Trust.)Global Masters estimates its fees at just 0.23%.

Which is fairly low. Cheaper than many exchange traded funds (ETFs).

Except … it’s not. Flicking open their annual report I see that shareholders also cough up for auditor costs, share registry costs, directors’ fees and admin costs. Put it all together and the true cost of investing through Global Masters is actually closer to 2.2% — and that’s bloody expensive!

So, Terry, considering you don’t even like the UK investments ... why not just Brexit?

With international brokerage fees as low $10 a trade (and there are some apps that are free, but they tend to screw you on the currency conversion), why not buy shares directly in Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) on the NY stock exchange?

After all, Buffett refers to his shareholders as partners, and treats them as such. A quick look at Berkshire’s annual report shows that he takes a salary of just ,000, and even reimburses the company for personal expenses.

Scott

19-Year-Old Girl Wins the Lottery

Hi Scott,

I am 19 and was given your book last Christmas. I am not the greatest saver — I like to splurge a little too often. Yet a year after reading the book I have over $16,000 in savings, $4,000 of which is in shares. Recently I did my tax return and the accountant was asking how a 19-year-old girl seems to have it so together. I explained that she could buy your book for $29.95 (or less at Big W), and while she was doing my tax return I drew your ‘serviette strategy’ on the back of an invoice sheet. She looked at me in amazement the entire time, even though I was basically regurgitating everything you had explained. It was an awesome feeling. So I wanted to say thank you — you have given me a $29.95 lottery ticket that has earned me thousands!

Zoe

Hi Zoe,

I’m punching the air as I’m reading this.

Most people leave school believing they have no idea about money, and then they prove it to themselves.

Not you!

I guarantee your accountant was thinking, “Why wasn’t I this sorted out when I was 19?”

(As are everyone reading this right now.)

Well done. You got this!

Scott

Don’t Raise a Tightarse

Hi Scott,

Loving your new book, but I have a question. If a child does not want to spend their accumulated ‘Splurge’ money, isn’t that effectively another form of savings? I am trying to identify the more important lesson. Is it the realisation through experience that splurging can result in the impulse buying of random, insignificant items or should it be rewarding the decision not to splurge at times and having that money to top up their savings?

Joanne

Hi Joanne,

Congratulations on doing the jam jars!

You’re well ahead of most parents, who do pocket money for a while and then let it fizzle out, and give up.

Getting your kids to dish their pocket money into three jars teaches fundamental life lessons:

The ‘Smile’ jar teaches them the power of saving up for something that makes them smile.

The ‘Give’ jar teaches them the joy of generosity, and breaks the entitled bratty mentality some kids have.

The ‘Splurge’ jar teaches them how to spend their money wisely and enjoy it.

(The biggest financial fear that I have for my kids — having the Barefoot Investor as their dad — is they’ll be so focused on money that they’ll become tightarses. I don’t want to raise stingy, money-hungry kids. There’s a fine line between “8-year-old Johnny’s such a good saver, he won’t spend a cent!” and “28-year-old John is such a tightarse, no wonder he doesn’t have a girlfriend”).

So, Joanne, I’d encourage your kids to splurge some of their money. Yes, they’ll make some mistakes, as we all do. But then again, that’s how we learn, right?

Scott

Eat, Pray, Dump

Hi Barefoot,

So I get a message from my wife at 2am while she is in Morocco (finding herself): “I think I’m going to move to Morocco, I’m so sorry.” This really was not expected, nor in my plan for the future. Now I am having to deal with all the financial responsibilities on my own, without a second income. I have a half-renovated house, our combined debts, and now legal fees to deal with the separation. I am 34 and earning good money ($140,000), but it feels like I have caught an STI from an overseas holiday that I didn’t even take!

James

Hey James,

It sounds like your ex-wife took the ‘Eat, Pray, Dump’ tour!

Seriously, I can’t imagine what it was like to get that text ‒ you must be going through hell. And while it probably feels like you’re the one here in Australia cleaning up the financial mess, you are both responsible for seeing this out.

So a couple of practical things: if you haven’t already shut down any joint bank accounts, credit cards or redraw facilities, do so immediately. Also, keep good notes on your finances, and engage a family solicitor.

You don’t mention kids and, given your age, it sounds like it may have been a short marriage. This will be taken into account, and should make things much simpler in coming to a final property settlement.

Obviously you are facing a financial setback, but at your age, and with your income, it’s something you will overcome. So think hard about whether you want to keep the house or sell and make a clean break … your ex-wife certainly has.

Thank-you for reading,

Scott

Is AMP Heading South?

Hi Barefoot,

On advice from our financial adviser, my wife and moved our super from Australian Super to AMP MyNorth Super a year ago. We have generally been happy with the advice we have received and, like all funds, in the past year MyNorth has had its ups and down. However, with the findings of the banking royal commission and recent stock market volatilities affecting AMP, we think we should maybe go back to the industry fund. Is it likely AMP could go under in future, meaning we could lose all our super?

Cliff

Hi Cliff,

I’ve had a number of people ask me the same question ‒ whether their money is safe with AMP.

Let me be clear: your money is safe.

That’s because the money you have in super is held via a legal trust for you. ‘(and this applies to AMP as much as any super fund)’. Super is strictly regulated, and the trustees have a legal duty to manage the fund for the benefit of members.

However, the same can’t be said for the suffering AMP shareholders.

The very fact that so many of its customers are questioning whether this 170-year-old blue-blooded company will survive is an indication of just how much the brand has been battered.

As Dr Phil says, it’s hard to win back trust.

Speaking of which, I’d ask your advisor to do a financial comparison between your old industry fund and your MyNorth fund since you switched.

Scott

Super Stressful

Hi Scott,

I am 27 and earn $95,000 a year, so my super is adding up. But I received my annual superannuation statement and found I am being charged three separate fees: administration fees (0.37%), investment fees (0.25%) and something called ‘indirect costs’ (0.64%). In your book you recommend paying no more than 0.85% in fees on super: does that refer to any type of fee charged, or only administration and investment fees? And do you have any idea what indirect costs are?

Lisa

Hey Lisa,

Good on you for being one of the few people who bothers to look at this stuff.

ASIC defines ‘indirect costs’ as costs “paid by your super fund to external providers that affects the value of your investment. Typically these are costs paid to investment managers.”

Bottom line? It’s another fee. All up, you are being slugged 1.26% of your balance each year.

If you’ve currently got $40,000 in super, that’s around $500 a year.

That doesn’t sound like much.

Yet, as a back-of-the-envelope calculation (6% real return, not factoring in tax), your super will grow to around $720,000 over the next four decades. However, the negative effect of the compounding fees will be roughly $220,000!

You’ve done the hard work by wading through the complicated, boring guff. Now comes the most profitable call you’ll ever make: call your fund and ask them if they have a high-growth, low-cost index super offering ‒ preferably one that charges less than 0.85% in fees, total.

Scott