Westfield – Barefoot Bluechips

20 comments

by Scott Pape - July 22nd 2011

westfield wdc blue chip shares stocksWe all know a story about a European immigrant who worked hard, bought property, and ended up rich, right? Well let me tell you about a couple of guys who became billionaires.

In the 1950s two Hungarians opened a delicatessen in Sydney’s Blacktown to cater to the growing numbers of migrants. Business was so good they had enough profits to start developing land on the side.

Soon they were making more out of property than they were out of cold cuts. That’s when they noticed that the Americans had begun building these things called ‘shopping malls’. They decided to build one in Sydney.

The site they chose was in Sydney’s West and it was located on farming fields, so they called it ‘Westfield’.

Frank Lowy was 26 years old and his business partner, John Saunders, was 32. Over the next fifty years they went on to create one of the most successful companies in Australia – if not the world. Anyone lucky enough to be an early investor would now be a millionaire many times over.

Every month or so I like to take a look at what I call a ‘Barefoot Bluechip’, a company that we all know, use and own – through our superannuation investments. So let’s see if Westfield is a stock you should have on your shopping list.

There are two securities that comprise Westfield: the Westfield Retail Trust (WRT), which has a 50 per cent share in the Australian and New Zealand shopping centres (including the mega-profitable Bondi Junction), and the Westfield Group (WDC), which has the balance of the Australian malls, the international assets and the property development business. Both stocks have forecasted healthy dividend yields of over 5.5 per cent.

With Westfield’s share price (WDC) trading near its lowest point in three years, let’s go shopping to see if there’s a bargain to be had.

How do they make their dough?

Remember earlier this year when Gerry Harvey got crucified for campaigning against GST-free online sales? There was a name missing from the coalition of big retailers – Westfield.

Why did they stay quiet?

Well, they didn’t want to draw attention to the fact that one of the major reasons retailers can’t compete with online sales is Westfield slugs its 24,000 tenants with some of the highest rents in the world. These costs are passed on to consumers, who are increasingly preferring to buy online.

Here’s how the business model works.

If you go into your local Westfield you’ll notice the big retailers – Coles, Woolies, Myer, DJs – take up most of the space. They’re the shops that suck people in, and that’s why Westfield signs these big guys up to long, relatively cheap leases.

They then lease out the rest of the shopping centre to smaller, specialty retailers like Smiggle and Supré – who feed off the foot traffic from the big boys – and sting them roughly six times the rent (per square metre) they charge the big boys. The smaller retailers make up over 80 per cent of the underlying profits of the group.

“Tell me the good stuff”

It generally always pays to back a self-made billionaire (or his sons, who now run the business) who has their own skin in the game, and for years the Westfield Group has generated extremely high profit margins.

While it costs a lot to build a shopping centre, once it’s completed the running costs are basically fixed, while the rental leases lock in terms that rise with inflation. And Westfield is a notoriously hardnosed negotiator (sometimes a little too hard according to the ACCC, who once found it had abused their market and commercial power).

There’s also speculation that Forever21, Abercrombie & Fitch and H&M will open stores in Australia in the next few years, which (as we’ve seen with the recent opening of Zara) pulls shoppers away from cyberspace and may help Westfield draw foot traffic so they can slug more of those small specialty retailers.

“Tell me the bad stuff”

Two words: online shopping.

The specialty retailers who for years have been coughing up to 80 per cent of Westfield’s profits to reach consumers can now build their presence online − much cheaper than paying sky-high rents.

And being in a Westfield shopping centre doesn’t automatically mean you’re going to be profitable, as Borders, Angus & Robertson and the Colorado Group have found.

Many of Westfield’s tenants are having a tough time – even the big boys. DJs last week forecast that sales would be down 11 per cent (citing everything other than its star CEO getting the chop).

Westfield’s competitors are now Amazon and eBay Australia, who are looking to entice traditional retailers to sell from their site, and a host of cut-priced overseas stores who with a strong dollar are cheaper than local retailers, and don’t charge GST.

Westfield is reportedly spending millions of dollars building its own virtual shopping mall to combat the growth of online shopping, but many retailers are skeptical about letting them clip their online ticket.

Most industry experts reckon the Apple Store is a good window into what traditional retailing will look like in the future: rather than competing with online shopping it complements it – you can go into the store, touch the merchandise, ask questions at the Genius Bar, and then buy online. This is what’s happening to Westfield tenants today – except punters are not going home and buying on their sites.

Toes up, or toes down?

Westfield is one of Australia’s best businesses. People will continue to shop in the future, and odds-on it will be at a Westfield centre – with its bars, restaurants and premier locations making it an experience in itself.

Retail property development is a tough business, as the debt-plagued DFO and corporate carcass of Centro attest. And with the second phase of the GFC underway, this could ironically be good news for Westfield. That’s because sharp operators like Lowy can pick up ‘fire sale’ bargains, and the threat of increasing prices is offset against their revenue being all but guaranteed by long-term inflation-adjusted leases.

So – in the short term at least – it’s toes up. But its reliance on smaller retailers, and therefore its long-term eye-popping profitability, will be tested over the next decade and beyond.

Tread Your Own Path!

barefoot investor google
Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/purplemattfish/3360590086/

Are you looking for 100% INDEPENDENT investing advice and ideas from Scott and the Barefoot Team?

Click here to access our latest share report – free of charge.

Follow @scottpape on Twitter



Barefoot also recommends:

  1. Woolworths – Barefoot Bluechips
  2. Commonwealth Bank – Barefoot Bluechips
  3. The QR Float – Barefoot Bluechips
  4. Argo Investments – Barefoot Bluechips

Leave a Comment

Cancel

20 comments

Joe July 22, 2011 at 2:43 pm

If the Apple store is a good example of where traditional bricks retailing is heading, wouldn’t that spell trouble for mall setups like Westfield?

A lot of those ‘specialty’ retailers wouldn’t have the brand power or reach to open up their own bricks / clicks hybrid store like apple has would they?

I know that the rent at my local shopping centre is sky high already…

Reply

Scott Pape July 22, 2011 at 4:17 pm

@Joe I think that’s at the heart of the problems facing them.

Reply

Garry July 22, 2011 at 2:46 pm

Using Centro and DFO as examples – I see the diagnosis for Westfield down the same line.

Online shopping is here to stay and anyone that doesn’t sell exclusive brands or provide an above computer experience is in serious trouble.

Reply

Kelly July 22, 2011 at 2:46 pm

Is there a good reason why Westfield is cut into 2 different shares?
Thnx

Reply

Otterman July 22, 2011 at 2:49 pm

They’ve definitely got a stranglehold on traditional retail outlets – gone of the days of having long street strips of stores – that only exists in places like Chapel st these days.

Reply

Kirk July 22, 2011 at 3:42 pm

Hmm, Borders and Angus – gone. Colorado group – gone. Your right, rents are high, so high that even companies that don’t have so much competition from online sales can’t exist. Centro – the GFC almost wiped them out. DFO group, broke. Unless Westfield start to discount rents now for existing leases or new leases, many more of their tenants will go under. Interesting times ahead.

Reply

Scott Pape July 22, 2011 at 4:14 pm

@Garry they have a very strong balance sheet.

Reply

Dave July 22, 2011 at 4:58 pm

Scott you start losing my respect when you start recommending stocks especially like this one.. I’m interested as to why you think the company has been split in two and where the risk is, where the debt lies and where the cream is. I think you will find the lowy family have positioned it in their favor .. Good luck with your path

Reply

Scott Pape July 22, 2011 at 5:05 pm

@Dave: The aim of the Barefoot Bluechip is to give investors across the country an inside view into stocks they already own through their super funds, and get them to see that investing isn’t something that happens ‘over there’, but is a part of their daily life.

Reply

Dave July 25, 2011 at 11:48 am

Hi Scott, I agree with your concept of making punters aware of where there money is invested. Perhaps you should rephrase it..as to be about company insights rather than a stock recommendation. After all you seem to support passive index ETF’s from what most of I have read – now we are moving on to actively picking stocks..? P.S On the subject of ETF’s it would be really good for your readers if you differentiate. There is a lot of rubbish in this sector now – of most concern to me is the development of synthetic ETF’s which mirror stock exposure without actually owning them. You know what happens to most of this clever concepts..

Reply

Not convinced July 22, 2011 at 5:32 pm

Other bad news – what about the trend of falling retail sales over the past few years? Is this a blip or a structural shift?

Reply

Richmond July 22, 2011 at 7:01 pm

As a stockmarket enthusiast i am particuly happy to see you writing about blue chips again Scott as i do enjoy your analytic break down of companies! Could you pencil in a date one day to writing about conglomerate Wesfarmers. That would be my first choice to take to the stockmarket party!

Reply

Jeff July 23, 2011 at 12:38 pm

I agree! It would be great to see these Barefoot Bluechip articles more regularly!

Reply

Glenn July 22, 2011 at 7:20 pm

scott you are absolutly right,i was one of those small retailers who had to close my business due to sky high rent and lack of sales yet westfield stayed :hardnosed: with lease negotiations, they seemed to be in denial about less foot traffic in there centres.

Reply

Donna July 22, 2011 at 9:27 pm

I also enjoy reading your take on stocks and shares – and the way you write about it. I would like to make one point tho – I have been to Westfields during school hols – and OMG, you can’t get a park; the thorough fair is full of mums, dads, teenagers (all with $). It’s rubbish the rents are so high but people are still buying.

Reply

Jenna July 25, 2011 at 5:39 pm

Agreed my two local Westfield shopping centres it is difficult to get a park on the weekend.

Unless people are there and not actually buying.

Reply

Andrew July 23, 2011 at 10:12 am

not claiming to be an expert on this but isnt online shopping the way to go? between ebay amazon and catch of the day sites how do you compete. there will always be certain things that need brick n mortar but the majority of stores i wonder how they do it. rivers turned from a normal apparel store to having fire sales every week. stuff like that makes me wonder.

Reply

matt July 24, 2011 at 4:14 pm

errr, yeah… their lowest value in 3 years? that might have something to do with the GFC coming along and telling us all that we had been spending too much at the mall for the last DECADE!

logically, when the shares are at 10 YEAR lows, they might be a good deal… (ok, ok, that’s negligibly simplistic, but you get my point)

of course, online shopping (worst of all, INTERNATIONAL online shopping) is an issue, and will get worse as time goes on inevitably KILLING shopping centers and this stock all together…

but the more immediate concern is what looks like a well ingrained shy away from over spending (and lets not beat around the bush, with the NEGATIVE savings rates of the past decade, we were all unsustainable OVER spending)

I think it is fair to say, that the age of the shopping center peaked in 2007.

not taking anything away from Frank’s BRILLIANT investment story.

Reply

Graham July 25, 2011 at 7:55 am

I work in the retail leasing area and recently Stockland have been seeking increases of upto 38% on a renewal of lease – obviously they haven’t heard of the difficult times retailers are exeperiencing. Retailers do not have the ability to raise their prices accross the board to achieve the greedy profits sought by Landlords.

Reply